Leadership today has evolved greatly and includes high performance within teams. Teamwork can also be the “secret sauce” that defines successful organizations. Our systems for supporting high performance and leadership in teams and in entire organizations have not kept up with the times. Some of our most persistent management practices date from the industrial age, including rating and rankings in performance systems and the difficulty of providing good performance data to teams.
At a recent workshop with JVS in Southfield Michigan, I shared some of the research and practical organization experience I’ve collected on high performance teams.
This video excerpt highlights examples of business member experiences with high performance teams, from the workshop:
Simply providing team access to performance data, however, can spur on team performance, including the example above of achieving a championship, (win-loss records.) The digital revolution will soon make performance data more widely available, and more accessible. ”Decision data” will not be exclusive to management. The role of, and needs for management may continue to shift.
As we hear of findings and new development from “big data” AND “small data” (highly personalized, tracked), it is also good to explore how access to performance data can inform leadership at all levels and encourage team achievement and speed, especially when old practices that slow and interfere with performance are removed.
That said, is important to remember the basics, what defines a team vs. a group:
“A team is a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable.”
from The Wisdom of Teams (Harvard Business School Press, 1993)
Note the differences between true teams vs. psuedo-teams and groups. Many project and task groups are assembled as teams to accomplish a charge or purpose. Sometimes these groups or teams:
- produce an innovation or breakthrough success for their organizations,
- are formed based on a favorite interest or pet project / idea of an executive that, in hindsight, provides limited value to their organization.
An invitation or “team charge” does not a team make. Here is an excerpt of some sample distinctions as a preview from next week’s post:
At JVS in Southfield, Michigan, I included a slide of my own informal findings of what stops performance dead in its tracks, including fresh insights from an interview of a millennial, a 25 year old, describing her work experience after graduating from college in 2010.
If any of these conditions exist, as she cites, good performance, let alone high performance will not happen. I’ll share the full interview including Part 2, her positive, encouraging work experiences, in my next post.
The full interview is sobering. It also may provoke new thinking about the role of managers in business, as well as non-profit and learning environments. It offers cautions to inexperienced managers.
To lend credence to this interview perspective, I have my own experiences as an internal consultant. I was hired by a number of university organizations over the years to deal with:
- Assessing vague, non-specific rumors of sexual harassment which I found to be true in one situation, not in another
- Finding the source of a persistent, toxic story about a professional that appeared to have been black-balled by faculty (remedied) that affected the department’s evaluative ratings and status
- Dealing with persistent, emotional, negative emails, a number of which were forwarded to senior executives and elected officials (remedied)
These sample situations could have easily been set within a for-profit business as well. You may find similar stories in your workplace. Experienced leaders know that whether or not a story is entirely true, a powerful story can take on a life of its own and can live in the grapevine for many years.
Stories are powerful. They can be positive and spur change. Stories can also be negative in how they can dampen morale, erode trust, affect performance metrics (productivity, reputation ratings, department evaluations and customer service evaluations.) Stories can help or hinder high performing teams and individual performance.
Here is one more team example, pointed and humorous, featuring a group of managers in what could be seen as a “Taker” or “Make the Boss Look Good” traditional, hierarchical culture. It’s a 2013 video, with 50′s-60′s era sensibilities:
What have you noticed?
- Have you experienced high performance teamwork vs. psuedo-teams or group work in your work or volunteer experiences?
- Do you recall times when group work is preferred (it’s faster) to the time it takes for a true team to form and produce results?
- Have you noticed the differences in high, medium and low performance teams or groups?
- Does the single, highest success factor in the research cited above, the Giver culture provide insights into what to do more of, stay the same, and what to stop doing?
As always, your comments enrich the learning!
Contact me here for more information about my workshops, consultation and coaching engagement options.
Thanks for visiting! ~ Deb
YOU ARE INVITED! For Deb’s latest Scoop-It news and tools for subscribers (e-books, trends, performance, innovation, power in organizations, myth-busting, creativity, leadership development), sign up on any of the Reveln INVITE boxes, and/or join my Facebook REVELN community here, or follow me & say hello on twitter. Postings are minimal, and we’d never share your email information.
You can also check out my fleet of ScoopIt newsletters directly (Talent and Performance Development, Innovation & Institutions, Change Leadership Watch, etc.) here.
I’m also on twitter, YouTube, Twylah and many other places. Search for “Deb Nystrom” and REVELN, or use key words in this article and you’ll find our digital resources.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons license.